for example, usa, australia, south africa%26lt;mostly black people on south africa's soccer team%26gt;, few exceptions like c. ronaldo.
No offense but who agrees that caucasians who move to other countries lose their ability to play soccer well?
Andrei Shevchenko is a Caucasian. He moved from the Ukraine to Italy and has just captured the record for most goals scored in the European Cup/Champions League. He is proof that you are mistaken in your opinion.
Reply:actually it is latino players who can't play anywhere else, that is why there are only 2 mexicans playing in europe and there are 43 americans playin in europe, haha get your facts straight you are sooo confused.
almost all americans start for their european teams what are you talking about?
ya and Van Nistelrooy doesn't play well either does he? haha
Reply:I see what you mean, but I disagree. I assume you mean that, if a Caucasian person moves (like with the colonies) they lose their ability to play soccer.
Apparently a lot of colonial movers (or whatever they're called) get interests in other sports or perhaps try to invent their own sports (e.g. basketball).
I believe, if you play as much soccer (in percentages) in Europe as in Australia, Australia wouldn't suck at football.
Reply:Nah! Argentinians are all of European descent and they are one of the best teams in the world.
All nations are good, but Europeans and Brazilians are the best.
I like South Korea, Japan and Nigeria a lot.
Reply:None of that is true. They don't lose their abilities to play. Look at all the Brazilians and Argentinians who play in Europe. They are amazing.
Cristiano Ronaldo is Portugese and not South African.
I think the cases you might see are because they move to a new country, they have to get accustomed to the language, to the team, and the coaches usually favor players from their country. Like Benitez favoring Spaniards, and Italian coaches favoring Italians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment