c++ exception: July 2009

Friday, July 31, 2009

Chemistry help?

1.As to the binding energy of different atomic nuclei, it turns out that

A.excepting radioactive elements, the most stable elements have mass numbers of 100 or higher

B.as binding energies increase, the stability of nuclei decreases

C.binding energies are strongest among the light elements with the exception of hydrogen

D.the most stable elements have mass numbers of around 56

2.Regarding types of organic reactions, which statements is false?

A.certain foods containing unsaturated molecules may be hydrogenated to maximize spoilage

B..if an unsaturated compound acquires a halogen---like flourine---the reaction is said to proceed by subsitution

C. unsaturated organic compounds have one or more double or triple bonds

D.if one hydrogen bond in a saturated organic compound is replaced by a bromine atom, we speak of subsitution

Chemistry help?
1. D

2. A
Reply:1. D

second not sure dude

Chemistry help?

I need help with nero vision 3?? suddenly not working wont do any burn phrase? it can buff and process files..

here is the error log....

[15:50:39] NeroVision Log created (Date: 01/11/2008)

[15:50:39] NeroVision Processors: 2 (Intel)

[15:50:39] NeroVision OS: Windows Windows XP Media Center Edition

[15:50:40] GCCore Detected DirectX Version: 9.0c

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft AC Adapter

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel Processor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel Processor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82802 Firmware Hub Device

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Programmable interrupt controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: System timer

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Direct memory access controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Standard 101/102-Key or Microsoft Natural PS/2 Keyboard

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: PCI bus

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: System CMOS/real time clock

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Motherboard resources

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Motherboard resources

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Numeric data processor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft ACPI-Compliant Embedded Controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft ACPI-Compliant Control Method Battery

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ACPI Power Button

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ACPI Lid

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Sony Notebook Control Device

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Alps Pointing-device for VAIO

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ACPI Thermal Zone

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ACPI Thermal Zone

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Plug and Play Monitor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Plug and Play Monitor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Plug and Play Monitor

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Disk drive

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Disk drive

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Realtek High Definition Audio

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: HDAUDIO Soft Data Fax Modem with SmartCP

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added:

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: CD-ROM Drive

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Disk drive

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ISAPNP Read Data Port

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic CardBus Controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Texas Instruments OHCI Compliant IEEE 1394 Host Controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Texas Instruments PCIxx12 Integrated FlashMedia Controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Marvell Yukon 88E8036 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: LAN-Express AS IEEE 802.11g PCI-E Adapter

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801 PCI Bridge - 2448

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Mobile Intel(R) 945GM/PM/GMS/940GML and Intel(R) 945GT Express Processor to DRAM Controller - 27A0

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Mobile Intel(R) 945GM Express Chipset Family

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Mobile Intel(R) 945GM Express Chipset Family

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801GBM (ICH7-M) LPC Interface Controller - 27B9

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7-M Family) Serial ATA Storage Controller - 27C4

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27C8

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27C9

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27CA

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 27CC

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Root Port - 27D0

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Root Port - 27D2

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Root Port - 27D4

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft UAA Bus Driver for High Definition Audio

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller - 27DA

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) Ultra ATA Storage Controllers - 27DF

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Primary IDE Channel

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Primary IDE Channel

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ACPI Multiprocessor PC

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft Composite Battery

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Logical Disk Manager

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Volume Manager

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Hewlett Packard PhotoSmart C20 Digital Camera

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: AEGIS Protocol (IEEE 802.1x) v3.5.3.0

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: AFD

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: 1394 ARP Client Protocol

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ASPI32

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Beep

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: dmboot

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Sony DMI Call service

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: dmload

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Symantec Eraser Control driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: EraserUtilRebootDrv

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Fips

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic Packet Classifier

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: HTTP

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: IPv6 Windows Firewall Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: IP Network Address Translator

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: IPSEC driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ksecdd

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: mnmdd

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: mountmgr

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: MRENDIS5 NDIS Protocol Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NAVENG

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NAVEX15

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NDIS System Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Remote Access NDIS TAPI Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NDIS Usermode I/O Protocol

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NDProxy

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NetBios over Tcpip

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Null

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Compatible Transport Protocol

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NWLink NetBIOS

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: NWLink SPX/SPXII Protocol

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: PartMgr

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: ParVdm

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Remote Access Auto Connection Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: RDPCDD

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WLAN Transport

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Serial

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SPBBCDrv

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SRTSPX

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMDNS

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SymEvent

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMFW

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMIDS

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMIDSCO

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: symlcbrd

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMNDIS

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMREDRV

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: SYMTDI

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: TCP/IP Protocol Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: VgaSave

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: VolSnap

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Remote Access IP ARP Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Windows Socket 2.0 Non-IFS Service Provider Support Environment

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Audio Codecs

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Legacy Audio Drivers

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Media Control Devices

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Legacy Video Capture Devices

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Video Codecs

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WAN Miniport (L2TP)

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WAN Miniport (IP)

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WAN Miniport (IPX)

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WAN Miniport (PPPOE)

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: WAN Miniport (PPTP)

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Packet Scheduler Miniport

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Packet Scheduler Miniport

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Packet Scheduler Miniport

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Direct Parallel

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: M-Systems DiskOnChip 2000

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Terminal Server Device Redirector

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Terminal Server Keyboard Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Terminal Server Mouse Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microcode Update Device

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft System Management BIOS Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic volume

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic volume

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic volume

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic volume

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Generic volume

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft Kernel System Audio Device

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft Kernel Wave Audio Mixer

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: Microsoft WINMM WDM Audio Compatibility Driver

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: USB Root Hub

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: USB Root Hub

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: USB Root Hub

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: USB Root Hub

[15:50:41] GCHW Node added: 1394 Net Adapter

[15:50:44] ExpressUI Running NeroVision Express 3 Version: 3.1.0.25

[15:50:46] DVDEngine DVDENGINE.DLL Version Information: Product Version: 3.1.0.11, File Version: 3.1.0.77, Interface Version: 4.0.0.2

[15:50:46] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:50:46] DVDEngine END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:50:46] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:50:46] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:02] MMTools SourceBuilder: building c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\Desperate.Housewives... video/0

[15:51:03] MMTools SourceBuilder: --- used source filters ---

[15:51:03] MMTools {E436EBB5-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770} - File Source (Async.)

[15:51:03] MMTools {1B544C20-FD0B-11CE-8C63-00AA0044B51E} - AVI Splitter

[15:51:03] MMTools {C0BA9CF8-96E0-4C34-B5DE-E92C3FC05ED6} - Nero Video Decoder

[15:51:03] MMTools SourceBuilder: file type AVI - video

[15:51:03] MMTools --------------------

[15:51:03] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:03] DVDEngine END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:03] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:03] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:06] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:06] DVDEngine END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:06] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:06] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:06] MMTools SourceBuilder: building c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\American.Gladiators.... video/0

[15:51:06] MMTools SourceBuilder: --- used source filters ---

[15:51:06] MMTools {E436EBB5-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770} - File Source (Async.)

[15:51:06] MMTools {1B544C20-FD0B-11CE-8C63-00AA0044B51E} - AVI Splitter

[15:51:06] MMTools {C0BA9CF8-96E0-4C34-B5DE-E92C3FC05ED6} - Nero Video Decoder

[15:51:06] MMTools SourceBuilder: file type AVI - video

[15:51:06] MMTools --------------------

[15:51:15] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:15] DVDEngine END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:15] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:15] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - ~IDVDVideoSessionImpl

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Burn process started by user.

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Destination: SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Directory for temporary files: C:\DOCUME~1\SARAHB~1\LOCALS~1\Temp

[15:51:23] ExpressUI ------%26lt;NeroVision Project Information%26gt;--------

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --- Project type: DVD-Video

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --- Project video options ---

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Video mode: NTSC

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Aspect ratio: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Quality: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Resolution: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Sample format: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI File type: MPEG-2

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Audio format: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Encoding mode: Fast Encoding (1-Pass)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --- Project space information ---

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Used disc space: 3.20 GB

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --- Project contents ---

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Sample format: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Audio format: Automatic

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Encoding mode: Fast Encoding (1-Pass)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Number of titles: 2

[15:51:23] ExpressUI 1. Desperate.Housewives.S04E10.PROPER.HDTV.... (Video Title, 0h 41m 28s)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Video mode: NTSC

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Aspect ratio: 16:9

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Quality: Standard play (5073 kbps)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Resolution: 704 x 480 (D1)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Audio SmartEncoding ratio: 0.0 %

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Video SmartEncoding ratio: 0.0 %

[15:51:23] ExpressUI 2. American.Gladiators.2008.S01E02.HDTV.Xvi... (Video Title, 0h 42m 23s)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Video mode: NTSC

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Aspect ratio: 16:9

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Quality: Standard play (5073 kbps)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Resolution: 704 x 480 (D1)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Audio SmartEncoding ratio: 0.0 %

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Video SmartEncoding ratio: 0.0 %

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Number of menus: 1

[15:51:23] ExpressUI - Main menu (1 page)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --------%26lt;End of Project Information%26gt;----------

[15:51:23] ExpressUI ------Recording Parameters------

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Book Type: 0

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Destination Device: SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A (Capabilities: 000AC117)

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Recording Flags: 77

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Recording Speed: 2089872920

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Volume Name: misc eps

[15:51:23] ExpressUI Burn-at-once flag: 1

[15:51:23] ExpressUI --End of recording parameters---

[15:51:23] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:23] DVDEngine END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateDVDVideoSession

[15:51:23] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterCallback

[15:51:23] DVDEngine ..Session callback registered...

[15:51:23] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterCallback

[15:51:23] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterApplicationService

[15:51:23] DVDEngine ..Application service registered...

[15:51:23] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterApplicationService

[15:51:23] DVDUI Device [SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A ] lock SUCCEED

[15:51:23] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - BeginDiscAccess

[15:51:23] DVDEngine ..Access mode=read/write

[15:51:23] DVDEngine ..Flags=0

[15:51:23] DVDEngine ..Write speed=2089872920 KB/s (1.5e+006x)

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ..Medium type=DVD+R

[15:51:24] DVDEngine DVD format is 1, media type is 0x00002008

[15:51:24] DVDEngine Supported Access Modes: 0x00000001

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - Update HCB state

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - Update HCB state

[15:51:24] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - BeginDiscAccess

[15:51:24] DVDUI Description creation/update : done

[15:51:24] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - Prepare

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ..BAO activated

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **BEGIN: _DVDVideo - Prepare

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ..VTS_Ns=2...

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ****BEGIN: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VMG

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...VMGM_VOBS_exist = true

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ******BEGIN: VMGM_VOBS - Process Create

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ********BEGIN: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Duration 333667

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ..._streamtime_frame_duration is 333667

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...This is a still stream

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Stream 0 is 'Video'

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Stream 1 is 'System/Stream'

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **********END: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:24] NeroVision Analyze video stream

[15:51:24] NeroVision Seg. | frames | weight | volume

[15:51:24] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:24] NeroVision 0 | 1 | 1 | 1

[15:51:24] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:24] NeroVision total : 1

[15:51:24] NeroVision Estimate Size

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision |Stream | Seg. | UnComp.| Duration | Size (KB)

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.03 | 150

[15:51:24] NeroVision | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision total data size : 382977 bytes

[15:51:24] NeroVision multiplexed size : 397312 bytes

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ********END: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ******END: VMGM_VOBS - Process Create

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ****END: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VMG

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ****BEGIN: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VTS#1

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...VTSM_VOBS_exist = false

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ******BEGIN: VTSTT_VOBS#1 - Process Create

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ********BEGIN: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Duration 24881881857

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ..._streamtime_frame_duration is 333667

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Stream 0 is 'Video'

[15:51:24] DVDEngine ...Stream 1 is 'Audio'

[15:51:24] DVDEngine **********END: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:24] NeroVision Analyze video stream

[15:51:24] NeroVision Seg. | frames | weight | volume

[15:51:24] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:24] NeroVision 0 | 74571 | 1 | 74571

[15:51:24] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:24] NeroVision total : 74571

[15:51:24] NeroVision Estimate Size

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision |Stream | Seg. | UnComp.| Duration | Size (KB)

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2488.19 | 1541066

[15:51:24] NeroVision | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2488.19 | 59717

[15:51:24] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:24] NeroVision total data size : 1639430797 bytes

[15:51:24] NeroVision multiplexed size : 1699309568 bytes

[15:51:24] MMTools SourceBuilder: building cached c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\Desperate.Housewives... video/0

[15:51:26] MMTools SourceBuilder: building c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\Desperate.Housewives... audio/0

[15:51:26] MMTools SourceBuilder: --- used source filters ---

[15:51:26] MMTools {E436EBB5-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770} - File Source (Async.)

[15:51:26] MMTools {1B544C20-FD0B-11CE-8C63-00AA0044B51E} - AVI Splitter

[15:51:26] MMTools {38BE3000-DBF4-11D0-860E-00A024CFEF6D} - MPEG Layer-3 Decoder

[15:51:26] MMTools SourceBuilder: file type AVI - audio

[15:51:26] MMTools --------------------

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ********END: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ******END: VTSTT_VOBS#1 - Process Create

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ****END: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VTS#1

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ****BEGIN: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VTS#2

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ...VTSM_VOBS_exist = false

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ******BEGIN: VTSTT_VOBS#2 - Process Create

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ********BEGIN: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:26] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ...Duration 25433767075

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ..._streamtime_frame_duration is 333667

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ...Stream 0 is 'Video'

[15:51:26] DVDEngine ...Stream 1 is 'Audio'

[15:51:26] DVDEngine **********END: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:26] NeroVision Analyze video stream

[15:51:26] NeroVision Seg. | frames | weight | volume

[15:51:26] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:26] NeroVision 0 | 76225 | 1 | 76225

[15:51:26] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:26] NeroVision total : 76225

[15:51:26] NeroVision Estimate Size

[15:51:26] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:26] NeroVision |Stream | Seg. | UnComp.| Duration | Size (KB)

[15:51:26] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:26] NeroVision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2543.38 | 1575242

[15:51:26] NeroVision | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2543.38 | 61041

[15:51:26] NeroVision +-------+------+--------+----------+----...

[15:51:26] NeroVision total data size : 1675783531 bytes

[15:51:26] NeroVision multiplexed size : 1736990720 bytes

[15:51:26] MMTools SourceBuilder: building cached c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\American.Gladiators.... video/0

[15:51:27] MMTools SourceBuilder: building c:\Documents and Settings\sarah Barrett\My Documents\Downloads\American.Gladiators.... audio/0

[15:51:27] MMTools SourceBuilder: --- used source filters ---

[15:51:27] MMTools {E436EBB5-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770} - File Source (Async.)

[15:51:27] MMTools {1B544C20-FD0B-11CE-8C63-00AA0044B51E} - AVI Splitter

[15:51:27] MMTools {38BE3000-DBF4-11D0-860E-00A024CFEF6D} - MPEG Layer-3 Decoder

[15:51:27] MMTools SourceBuilder: file type AVI - audio

[15:51:27] MMTools --------------------

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ********END: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ******END: VTSTT_VOBS#2 - Process Create

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ****END: _DVDVideoBase - Prepare VTS#2

[15:51:27] DVDEngine **END: _DVDVideo - Prepare

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..Estimated size=3.20 GB

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..Estimated duration=1 hour 8 min 40 sec

[15:51:27] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - Prepare

[15:51:27] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - GetDiscCaps

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..Caps=DSCCAP_VLMNM_UDF | DSCCAP_VLMNM_ISO9660

[15:51:27] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - GetDiscCaps

[15:51:27] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - SetLabel

[15:51:27] DVDEngine Volume name (ISO9660)="________"

[15:51:27] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - SetLabel

[15:51:27] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - SetLabel

[15:51:27] DVDEngine Volume name (UDF)="misc eps"

[15:51:27] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - SetLabel

[15:51:27] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - GetDiscContent

[15:51:27] DVDEngine **BEGIN: _DVDVideo - Fill FileSystemDescContainer

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VIDEO_TS.IFO' (VMGI), location={undefined}, size=12.0 KB (12,288 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VIDEO_TS.VOB' (VMGM_VOBS), location={undefined}, size=416 KB (425,984 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VIDEO_TS.BUP' (VMGI), location={undefined}, size=12.0 KB (12,288 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_0.IFO' (VTSI), location={undefined}, size=36.0 KB (36,864 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB' (VTSTT_VOBS), location={undefined}, size=1.58 GB (1,699,315,712 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_0.BUP' (VTSI), location={undefined}, size=36.0 KB (36,864 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_0.IFO' (VTSI), location={undefined}, size=36.0 KB (36,864 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_1.VOB' (VTSTT_VOBS), location={undefined}, size=1.62 GB (1,736,998,912 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine ..File: 'VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_0.BUP' (VTSI), location={undefined}, size=36.0 KB (36,864 bytes)

[15:51:27] DVDEngine **END: _DVDVideo - Fill FileSystemDescContainer

[15:51:27] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - GetDiscContent

[15:51:28] NeroAPI Can only write at 6x (8,310 KB/s) instead of 1.5144e+006x (2,089,872,920 KB/s) to current disc.

[15:51:28] NeroAPI Burn process started at 6x (8,310 KB/s)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - CreateDisc

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **BEGIN: _DVDVideo - Create

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ****BEGIN: Create - VMGM_VOBS

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ******BEGIN: VMGM_VOBS - Process Create

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ********BEGIN: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Duration 333667

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..._streamtime_frame_duration is 333667

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...This is a still stream

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Stream 0 is 'Video'

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Stream 1 is 'System/Stream'

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********END: _VOBS - _M_analyze_cnv_input

[15:51:28] NeroVision Analyze video stream

[15:51:28] NeroVision Seg. | frames | weight | volume

[15:51:28] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:28] NeroVision 0 | 1 | 1 | 1

[15:51:28] NeroVision ------+---------+--------+--------

[15:51:28] NeroVision total : 1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateSubpictureSource

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********END: IDVDEngineManagerImpl - CreateSubpictureSource

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********BEGIN: CSPU::Process()

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...'Decoding SubPicture No.' is '0'

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..._nLines == 480

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Found 'bottom half' in the bottom field at bit 6880, addr. is 860 (241)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Detected 'top half' at 1, addr. is 2

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Detected 'bottom half' at 1, addr. is 860

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...Lines processed: 480

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...processed 1 packs

[15:51:28] DVDEngine **********END: CSPU::Process()

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...New VOB 1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..+VOB#1: VOB_IDN=1, SA=0, VOB_V_S_PTM=27844

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...New CELL 1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ....+Cell#1: C_IDN=1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine BTNGR1_DSP_TY == 15587870

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ....|Cell#1: C_IDN=1, [0;17], VOBU_Ns=1, C_PBTM=0s.12

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..|VOB#1: VOB_IDN=1, [0;17], C_Ns=1, VOB_V_S_PTM=27844, VOB_V_E_PTM=63880

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ********END: _VOBS - Process VOB

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ********BEGIN: VMGM_VOBS - INFORMATION after Create

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ----------------------------------------...

[15:51:28] DVDEngine General information:

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..size=18 (36.0 KB)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..capacity=18 (36.0 KB)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..max_capacity=524287 (1.00 GB)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..VOB_Ns=1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..C_Ns=1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..VOBU_Ns=1

[15:51:28] DVDEngine VOB information:

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ...VOB#1: VOB_IDN=1, [0;17], C_Ns=1, VOB_V_S_PTM=27844, VOB_V_E_PTM=63880

[15:51:28] DVDEngine .....Cell#1: C_IDN=1, [0;17], VOBU_Ns=1, C_PBTM=0s.12

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ----------------------------------------...

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ********END: VMGM_VOBS - INFORMATION after Create

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ******END: VMGM_VOBS - Process Create

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ******BEGIN: VMGM_VOBS - Verify

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ******END: VMGM_VOBS - Verify

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ..VMGM_VOBS: size=36.0 KB (36,864 bytes)

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ****END: Create - VMGM_VOBS

[15:51:28] DVDEngine ****BEGIN: Create - VTSTT_VOBS#1

[15:51:55] NeroAPI Writing file to disc failed

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ########################################...

[15:51:55] DVDEngine _BAOFile::Write(): NeroBAOOpenFile() returned 3 (NEROAPI_BURN_FAILED)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ########################################...

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 1A2002310530177704728594*

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Windows XP 5.1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine IA32

[15:51:55] DVDEngine WinAspi: File 'Wnaspi32.dll': Ver=4.60 (1021), size=45056 bytes, created 10/09/1999 12:06:00

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ahead WinASPI: File 'C:\Program Files\Ahead\NeroVision\NeroFiles\Wnaspi3... Ver=2.0.1.74, size=164112 bytes, created 02/11/2004 12:54:32

[15:51:55] DVDEngine NT-SPTI used

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Nero API version: 6.6.1.4

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Using interface version: 6.6.0.10

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Installed in: C:\Program Files\Ahead\NeroVision\NeroFiles\

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Application: ahead\NeroVision

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Internal Version: 6, 6, 1, 4d

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Recorder: %26lt;SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A%26gt; Version: 2.73 - HA 1 TA 0 - 6.6.1.4

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Adapter driver: %26lt;IDE%26gt; HA 1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Drive buffer : 2048kB

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Bus Type : via Inquiry data (1) -%26gt; ATAPI, detected: ?

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Connected to MMC as unknown drive with class-nr : 1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Drive is autodetected - recorder class: Std. MMC recorder

[15:51:55] DVDEngine === Scsi-Device-Map ===

[15:51:55] DVDEngine CdRomPeripheral : SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A atapi Port 0 ID 0 DMA: On

[15:51:55] DVDEngine DiskPeripheral : TOSHIBA MK8032GSX atapi Port 1 ID 0 DMA: On

[15:51:55] DVDEngine === CDRom-Device-Map ===

[15:51:55] DVDEngine SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A G: CDRom0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine =======================

[15:51:55] DVDEngine AutoRun : 1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Excluded drive IDs:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine WriteBufferSize: 83886080 (0) Byte

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ShowDrvBufStat : 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine BUFE : 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Physical memory : 1014MB (1038444kB)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Free physical memory: 225MB (230832kB)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Memory in use : 77 %

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Uncached PFiles: 0x0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Use Inquiry : 1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Global Bus Type: default (0)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Check supported media : Disabled (0)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 11.1.2008

[15:51:55] DVDEngine NeroAPI

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #1 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 281

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Last possible write address on media: 2295103 (510:01.28, 4482MB)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Last address to be written: -1 ( 0:00.-1, 0MB)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #2 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 293

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Write in overburning mode: NO (enabled: CD)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #3 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 2612

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Recorder: SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A, Media type: DVD+R

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC MAG, Media Type ID: E01, Product revision number: 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc Application Code: 0, Extended Information Indicators: 3

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #4 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 459

[15:51:55] DVDEngine %26gt;%26gt;%26gt; Protocol of DlgWaitCD activities: %26lt;%26lt;%26lt;

[15:51:55] DVDEngine =======================================...

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #5 Text 0 File SCSIPassThrough.cpp, Line 38

[15:51:55] DVDEngine SPTILockVolume - completed successfully for FCTL_LOCK_VOLUME

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #6 Text 0 File SCSIPassThrough.cpp, Line 83

[15:51:55] DVDEngine SPTIDismountVolume - completed successfully for FSCTL_DISMOUNT_VOLUME

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #7 Text 0 File Cdrdrv.cpp, Line 8647

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ---- DVD Structure: Physical Format Information (00h) ----

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Media Type: 0, Layer: 0, Address: 0 (0 h), AGID: 0; Length: 2050

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Book Type: DVD+R (10), Part Version: 1.0x (1)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc Size: 120 mm, Maximum Rate: %26lt;not specified%26gt; (F h)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Number of Layers: 1, Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP), Layer Type: recordable

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Linear Density: 0,267 um/bit, Track Density: 0,74 um/track

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Starting Physical Sector Number of Data Area: 30000 h (DVD-ROM, DVD-R/-RW, DVD+R/+RW)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine End Physical Sector Number of Data Area: 26053F h

[15:51:55] DVDEngine End Sector Number in Layer 0: 0 h (LBN: FFFD0000 h, 4193920 MB)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Data in Burst Cutting Area (BCA) does not exist

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc Application Code: 0 / 0 h

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Extended Information indicators: 3 h

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC.MAG.

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Media type ID: E01

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Product revision number: 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Number of Physical format information bytes in use in ADIP up to byte 63: 56

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Media Specific [16..63]:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 00 00 03 43 4D 43 20 4D - 41 47 00 45 30 31 00 38 ...CMC.MAG.E01.8

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 23 54 37 10 02 38 6A 02 - 88 67 15 15 0B 0B 08 08 #T7..8j..g......

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 01 19 1B 0C 0C 0C 0D 01 - 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #8 Text 0 File DVDPlusRW.cpp, Line 666

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Start write address at LBA 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine DVD high compatibility mode: No

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #9 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 939

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Can only write at 6x (8,310 KB/s) instead of 1.5144e+006x (2,089,872,920 KB/s) to current disc.

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #10 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 1010

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Estimated filesystem size: 544

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #11 Phase 36 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 275

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Burn process started at 6x (8,310 KB/s)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #12 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 1704

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Buffering files started

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #13 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 1415

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Buffering VIDEO_TS.VOB

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #14 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 2580

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Finished buffering file VIDEO_TS.VOB of size 36864 bytes (18 sectors)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #15 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 2647

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Finished writing file VIDEO_TS.VOB of size 36864 bytes (18 sectors)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:28 #16 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 2660

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Buffering files finished successfully

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:54 #17 SPTI -1106 File SCSIPassThrough.cpp, Line 289

[15:51:55] DVDEngine G: CdRom0: SCSIStatus(x02) WinError(0) NeroError(-1106)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Sense Key: 0x03 (KEY_MEDIUM_ERROR)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Sense Code: 0x73

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Sense Qual: 0x03

[15:51:55] DVDEngine CDB Data: 0x53 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 60 00 00 00

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Sense Area: 0x70 00 03 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 73 03

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:54 #18 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 681

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Error reserving fragment (0)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:55 #19 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 3657

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc info:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Partitions: 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:55 #20 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 1877

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Error reserving start segment

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:55 #21 Text 0 File BurnAtOnceRecorder.cpp, Line 3657

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Disc info:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Partitions: 0

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine 15:51:55 #22 Phase 179 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 275

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Writing file to disc failed

[15:51:55] DVDEngine

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Existing drivers:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine File 'Drivers\CDRALW2K.SYS': Ver=8.0.0.212 , size=2560 bytes, created 03/11/2005 02:00:00

[15:51:55] DVDEngine File 'Drivers\ASPI32.SYS': Ver=4.60 (1021), size=25244 bytes, created 10/09/1999 12:06:00

[15:51:55] DVDEngine File 'Drivers\PXHELP20.SYS': Ver=3.00.43J, size=36624 bytes, created 23/04/2007 00:15:25 (Prassi/Veritas driver for win 2K)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine Registry Keys:

[15:51:55] DVDEngine HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WinLogon\AllocateCDROM... : 0 (Security Option)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine _Xcept (): Signalling Exception: 129 NeroBAOOpenFile() returned error condition _BAOContext::OpenFile()

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ****END: Create - VTSTT_VOBS#1

[15:51:55] DVDEngine **END: _DVDVideo - Create

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ########################################...

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ERROR

[15:51:55] DVDEngine cause: 129 (neroapi_call_failed)

[15:51:55] DVDEngine source: NeroBAOOpenFile() returned error condition

[15:51:55] DVDEngine description: _BAOContext::OpenFile()

[15:51:55] DVDEngine ########################################...

[15:51:55] DVDEngine **BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - Clear

[15:51:55] DVDEngine **END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - Clear

[15:51:55] DVDEngine END: IDVDVideoSessionImpl - CreateDisc

[15:51:59] NeroAPI Burn process failed at 6x (8,310 KB/s)

[15:51:59] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - EndDiscAccess

[15:51:59] DVDEngine ..Flags=0

[15:51:59] DVDEngine **BEGIN: _MediaAccess::Release ()

[15:51:59] DVDEngine **END: _MediaAccess::Release ()

[15:51:59] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - EndDiscAccess

[15:51:59] DVDEngine BEGIN: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterCallback

[15:51:59] DVDEngine ..Session callback unregistered...

[15:51:59] DVDEngine END: IDVDSessionBaseImpl - RegisterCallback

[15:51:59] DVDUI Device [SONY DVD RW AW-Q540A ] unlock SUCCEED

I need help with nero vision 3?? suddenly not working wont do any burn phrase? it can buff and process files..
can you give abit more information please

Help please?

32. Long-term growth in production can be explained by

a. an improvement in the quality of resources available

b. a gradual but consistent rise in the price level

c. a rapid and accelerating increase in the price level

d. a trade surplus that leads to the accumulation of gold

e. the peaks and troughs of economic fluctuations

33. "The most important factor in determining a nation's standard of living in the long run is the productivity of its resources."

a. True

b. False

34. If Q is total real output, K is capital in use, and L is labor employed, the productivity of labor is measured by

a. K/L

b. L/K

c. Q/L

d. Q/K

e. (Q + K)/L

35. Labor productivity tends to fall as the capital-labor ratio rises.

a. True

b. False

36. Human capital includes the machinery, equipment and other manufactured creations used to produce goods and services.

a. True

b. False

37. An example of an increase in human capital would be

a. a new machine that humans use to produce more capital

b. an increase in wealth

c. a more educated labor force

d. all of the above

e. both a and c

38. Labor productivity is measured as

a. the value of total output times total employment

b. total output of all workers employed

c. total output divided by the number of units of labor employed

d. total labor input divided by output

e. average output per unit of capital

39. Improvements in technology shift the per-worker production function downward.

a. True

b. False

40. Which of the following would not increase labor productivity?

a. technological change

b. an increased amount of capital per unit of labor

c. a lower unemployment rate

d. greater job experience for the work force

e. all of the above increase labor productivity

41. An improvement in the quality of capital would

a. rotate the per-worker production function upward

b. make the per-worker production function flatter

c. shift the per-worker production function downward

d. rotate the per-worker production function downward

e. have no effect on the per-worker production function

42. Which of the following is most likely to increase productivity growth, as measured using GDP statistics?

a. reduced capital formation

b. decreased human capital

c. increased research and development

d. increased government regulation

e. higher prices for raw materials

43. The rules of the game refer to

a. any factor that facilitates production and exchange

b. a gradual but consistent change in the price level until a fair price is attained

c. the set of election laws that ensure that all votes are counted in every election

d. the requirements place on firms earning a profit

e. the requirements that households must provide funding for the investments that firms need to make

44. The rules of the game include all of the following except one. Which is the exception?

a. the laws, customs, conventions and other institutional elements associated with trade

b. property rights

c. ensuring that the market process generates a fair price to all

d. a stable political environment

e. a stable legal system

45. Which of the following is not be considered a developed country?

a. Pakistan

b. the United States

c. Japan

d. Australia

e. Belgium

46. Over the last century, U.S. labor productivity has

a. fallen

b. been constant, on average

c. grown at about 2 percent per year

d. grown at about 8 percent per year

e. grown at about 15 percent per year

47. Productivity growth is important because

a. it is the only way an economy can increase GDP

b. a small decrease in productivity growth causes a large decline in GDP

c. a large increase in productivity growth causes a small decrease in GDP

d. it causes an increase in the quantity of all resources available to an economy

e. it ultimately increases a nation's standard of living

48. The process of adding more capital per worker is known as "capital deepening."

a. True

b. False

Help please?
32 a

33 true

34a

35true

36 false

37c

38 c

39false

40e

41a

42c

43a

44c

45 a

46 c

47a

48a
Reply:This is ridiculous. Try learning something and answering on your own.
Reply:a,a,c,b,b,c,a,b,c,e,b,a,c,a,e,e,a
Reply:Please ...what r u talking about?
Reply:Micheal T: go 'a' on all your answer

(and please make sure I get the easy 10 points!)
Reply:do ur own homework

online survey

Fact of this case?

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Rodger LINDH, Appellee,

v.

Janis SURMAN, Appellant.

Argued March 8, 1999.

Decided Nov. 23, 1999.

Reargument Denied Dec. 21, 1999.

Purchaser of engagement ring appealed arbitration decision that awarded ring to his former fiancee. After bench trial, the Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County, Civil Division, No. AR 0318394, Mazur, J., entered judgment in favor of purchaser. Former fiancee appealed. The Superior Court, No. 0524PGH96, 702 A.2d 560, affirmed, and former fiancee appealed. On grant of allocatur, the Supreme Court, No. 0039 W.D. Appeal Docket 1998, Newman, J., held that purchaser was entitled to return of the ring under no-fault approach to engagement ring disputes, though he broke the engagement.

Affirmed.

Cappy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Castille and Saylor, JJ., joined.

Castille filed a dissenting opinion, in which Cappy and Saylor, JJ., joined.

West Headnotes

[1] Gifts 34

191k34 Most Cited Cases

The law treats the giving of an engagement ring as a conditional gift.

[2] Gifts 34

191k34 Most Cited Cases

The giving of an engagement gift has an implied condition that the marriage must occur in order to vest title in the donee; mere acceptance of the marriage proposal is not the implied condition for the gift.

[3] Gifts 34

191k34 Most Cited Cases

Donor of engagement ring was entitled to return of the ring from former fiancee, under no-fault approach to resolution of engagement ring disputes, though he broke the engagement.

[4] Gifts 34

191k34 Most Cited Cases

A strict no-fault approach is adopted to determine engagement ring disputes, rather than a fault-based theory or a modified no-fault position, which would look at the reasons for termination of the engagement.

**643*2 Frank E. Reilly, Pittsburgh, for Janis Surman.

Joanne Ross Wilder, Pittsburgh, for Rodger Lindh.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a donee of an engagement ring must return the ring or its equivalent value when the donor breaks the engagement.

*3 The facts of this case depict a tumultuous engagement between Rodger Lindh (Rodger), a divorced, middle-aged man, and Janis Surman (Janis), the object of Rodger's inconstant affections. In August of 1993, Rodger proposed marriage to Janis. To that purpose, he presented her with a diamond engagement ring that he purchased for $17,400. Rodger testified that the price was less than the ring's market value because he was a "good customer" of the jeweler's, having previously purchased a $4,000 ring for his ex-wife and other expensive jewelry for his children. Janis, who had never been married, accepted his marriage proposal and the ring. Discord developed in the relationship between Rodger and Janis, and in October of 1993 Rodger broke the engagement and asked for the return of the ring. At that time, Janis obliged and gave Rodger the ring. Rodger and Janis attempted to reconcile. They succeeded, and Rodger again proposed **644 marriage, and offered the ring, to Janis. For a second time, Janis accepted. In March of 1994, however, Rodger called off the engagement. He asked for the return of the ring, which Janis refused, and this litigation ensued.

Rodger filed a two-count complaint against Janis, seeking recovery of the ring or a judgment for its equivalent value. The case proceeded to arbitration, where a panel of arbitrators awarded judgment for Janis. Rodger appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, where a brief non-jury trial resulted in a judgment in favor of Rodger in the amount of $21,200. [FN1] Janis appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed the trial court in a 2-1 panel decision. Judge Ford Elliott, writing for the majority, held that no-fault principles should control, and that the ring must be returned regardless of who broke the engagement, and irrespective of the reasons. In a Dissenting Opinion, Judge Schiller criticized the Majority Opinion for creating what he termed a "romantic bailment" because of its refusal to examine the actions of the donor in breaking the engagement, thereby creating a per se rule requiring the return of an engagement ring in all circumstances. *4 We granted allocatur to answer this novel question of Pennsylvania law.

FN1. The basis for the $21,200 award of the trial court was Rodger's testimony that this was the fair market value of the ring.

[1] We begin our analysis with the only principle on which all parties agree: that Pennsylvania law treats the giving of an engagement ring as a conditional gift. See Pavlicic v. Vogtsberger, 390 Pa. 502, 136 A.2d 127 (1957). In Pavlicic, the plaintiff supplied his ostensible fiancée with numerous gifts, including money for the purchase of engagement and wedding rings, with the understanding that they were given on the condition that she marry him. When the defendant left him for another man, the plaintiff sued her for recovery of these gifts. Justice Musmanno explained the conditional gift principle:

A gift given by a man to a woman on condition that she embark on the sea of matrimony with him is no different from a gift based on the condition that the donee sail on any other sea. If, after receiving the provisional gift, the donee refuses to leave the harbor,--if the anchor of contractual performance sticks in the sands of irresolution and procrastination--the gift must be restored to the donor.

Id. at 507, 136 A.2d at 130.

Where the parties disagree, however, is: (1) what is the condition of the gift (i.e., acceptance of the engagement or the marriage itself), and (2) whether fault is relevant to determining return of the ring. Janis argues that the condition of the gift is acceptance of the marriage proposal, not the performance of the marriage ceremony. She also contends that Pennsylvania law, which treats engagement gifts as implied-in-law conditional gifts, has never recognized a right of recovery in a donor who severs the engagement. In her view, we should not recognize such a right where the donor breaks off the engagement, because, if the condition of the gift is performance of the marriage ceremony, that would reward a donor who prevents the occurrence of the condition, which the donee was ready, willing, and eagerly waiting to perform.

[2] Janis first argues that the condition of the gift is acceptance *5 of the proposal of marriage, such that acceptance of the proposal vests absolute title in the donee. This theory is contrary to Pennsylvania's view of the engagement ring situation. In Ruehling v. Hornung, 98 Pa.Super. 535 (1930), the Superior Court provided what is still the most thorough Pennsylvania appellate court analysis of the problem:

It does not appear whether the engagement was broken by plaintiff or whether it was dissolved by mutual consent. It **645 follows that in order to permit a recovery by plaintiff, it would be necessary to hold that the gifts were subject to the implied condition that they would be returned by the donee to the donor whenever the engagement was dissolved. Under such a rule the marriage would be a necessary prerequisite to the passing of an absolute title to a Christmas gift made in such circumstances. We are unwilling to go that far, except as to the engagement ring.

Id. at 540 (emphasis added). This Court later affirmed that "[t]he promise to return an antenuptial gift made in contemplation of marriage if the marriage does not take place is a fictitious promise implied in law." Semenza v. Alfano, 443 Pa. 201, 204, 279 A.2d 29, 31 (1971) (emphasis added). Our caselaw clearly recognizes the giving of an engagement gift as having an implied condition that the marriage must occur in order to vest title in the donee; mere acceptance of the marriage proposal is not the implied condition for the gift.

Janis' argument that Pennsylvania law does not permit the donor to recover the ring where the donor terminates the engagement has some basis in the few Pennsylvania authorities that have addressed the matter. The following language from Ruehling implies that Janis' position is correct:

We think that it [the engagement ring] is always given subject to the implied condition that if the marriage does not take place either because of the death, or a disability recognized by the law on the part of, either party, or by breach of the contract by the donee, or its dissolution by mutual consent, the gift shall be returned.

Ruehling, 98 Pa.Super. at 540. Noticeably absent from the recital by the court of the situations where the ring must be returned is when the donor breaks the engagement. Other *6 Pennsylvania authorities also suggest that the donor cannot recover the ring when the donor breaks the engagement. See 7 Summary of Pennsylvania Jurisprudence 2d § 15:29, p. 111 ("upon breach of the marriage engagement by the donee, the property may be recovered by the donor"); 17 Pennsylvania Law Encyclopedia, "Gifts," § 9, p. 118 (citing to a 1953 common pleas court decision, "[i]f, on the other hand, the donor wrongfully terminates the engagement, he is not entitled to return of the ring").

[3] This Court, however, has not decided the question of whether the donor is entitled to return of the ring where the donor admittedly ended the engagement. In the context of our conditional gift approach to engagement rings, the issue we must resolve is whether we will follow the fault-based theory, argued by Janis, or the no-fault rule advocated by Rodger. Under a fault-based analysis, return of the ring depends on an assessment of who broke the engagement, which necessarily entails a determination of why that person broke the engagement. A no-fault approach, however, involves no investigation into the motives or reasons for the cessation of the engagement and requires the return of the engagement ring simply upon the nonoccurrence of the marriage.

The rule concerning the return of a ring founded on fault principles has superficial appeal because, in the most outrageous instances of unfair behavior, it appeals to our sense of equity. Where one fiancée has truly "wronged" the other, depending on whether that person was the donor of the ring or the donee, justice appears to dictate that the wronged individual should be allowed to keep, or have the ring returned. However, the process of determining who is "wrong" and who is "right," when most modern relationships are complex circumstances, makes the fault-based approach less desirable. A thorough fault-based inquiry would not only end with the question of who terminated the engagement, but would also examine that person's reasons. In some instances the person who terminated the engagement may have been entirely justified in his or her actions. **646 This kind of inquiry would invite the parties to stage the most bitter and unpleasant *7 accusations against those whom they nearly made their spouse, and a court would have no clear guidance with regard to how to ascertain who was "at fault." The Supreme Court of Kansas recited the difficulties with the fault-based system:

What is fault or the unjustifiable calling off of an engagement? By way of illustration, should courts be asked to determine which of the following grounds for breaking an engagement is fault or justified? (1) The parties have nothing in common; (2) one party cannot stand prospective in-laws; (3) a minor child of one of the parties is hostile to and will not accept the other party; (4) an adult child of one of the parties will not accept the other party; (5) the parties' pets do not get along; (6) a party was too hasty in proposing or accepting the proposal; (7) the engagement was a rebound situation which is now regretted; (8) one party has untidy habits that irritate the other; or (9) the parties have religious differences. The list could be endless.

Heiman v. Parrish, 262 Kan. 926, 942 P.2d 631, 637 (1997).

A ring-return rule based on fault principles will inevitably invite acrimony and encourage parties to portray their ex-fiancées in the worst possible light, hoping to drag out the most favorable arguments to justify, or to attack, the termination of an engagement. Furthermore, it is unlikely that trial courts would be presented with situations where fault was clear and easily ascertained and, as noted earlier, determining what constitutes fault would result in a rule that would defy universal application.

The approach that has been described as the modern trend is to apply a no-fault rule to engagement ring cases. See Vigil v. Haber, 888 P.2d at 455 (N.M.1994). Courts that have applied no-fault principles to engagement ring cases have borrowed from the policies of their respective legislatures that have moved away from the notion of fault in their divorce statutes. See, e.g., Vigil, supra (relying on the New Mexico legislature's enactment of the first no-fault divorce statute); Aronow v. Silver, 223 N.J.Super. 344, 538 A.2d 851 (1987) (noting New Jersey's approval of no-fault divorce). As described by the court in Vigil, this trend represents a move *8 " towards a policy that removes fault-finding from the personal-relationship dynamics of marriage and divorce." Vigil, 888 P.2d at 457. Indeed, by 1986, with the passage by the South Dakota legislature of no-fault divorce provisions, all fifty states had adopted some form of no-fault divorce. Doris Jonas Freed %26amp; Timothy B. Walker, Family Law in the Fifty States: An Overview, 19 Fam. L.Q. 331, 335 (1986). Pennsylvania, no exception to this trend, recognizes no-fault divorces. [FN2] See 23 Pa.C.S. § 3301 (c), (d). We agree with those jurisdictions that have looked towards the development of no-fault divorce law for a principle to decide engagement ring cases, and the inherent weaknesses in any fault-based system lead us to adopt a no-fault approach to resolution of engagement ring disputes.

FN2. The Superior Court explained the rationale behind the legislature's enactment, in 1980, of provisions for no-fault divorce:

we emphasize that the purpose of the legislature's enactment of no-fault provisions in divorce in addition to the traditional fault provisions was to provide for dissolution of marriage in a manner which would keep pace with contemporary social realities and not to advance "the vindication of private rights or the punishment of matrimonial wrongs."

Jayne v. Jayne, 443 Pa.Super. 664, 674, 663 A.2d 169, 174 (1995) (citations omitted).

Having adopted this no-fault principle, we still must address the original argument that the donor should not get return of the ring when the donor terminates the engagement. Such a rule would be consonant with a no-fault approach, it is argued, because it need not look at the reasons for termination of the engagement; if there is proof that the donor ended the relationship, **647 then he has frustrated the occurrence of the condition and cannot benefit from that. In other words, we are asked to adopt a no-fault approach that would always deny the donor return of the ring where the donor breaks the engagement.

[4] We decline to adopt this modified no-fault position, [FN3] and hold that the donor is entitled to return of the ring even if *9 the donor broke the engagement. We believe that the benefits from the certainty of our rule outweigh its negatives, and that a strict no-fault approach is less flawed than a fault-based theory or modified no-fault position. [FN4]

FN3. The modified no-fault position is no more satisfactory than a strict no-fault system because it, too, would create an injustice whenever the donor who called off the wedding had compelling reasons to do so.

FN4. Although other "scenarios" related to the consequences of a cancelled wedding can undoubtedly be "envisioned," they are not presented for decision in this case and therefore warrant no comment.

We affirm the Order of the Superior Court.

Justice CAPPY files a dissenting opinion in which Justices CASTILLE and SAYLOR join.

Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting opinion in which Justices CAPPY and SAYLOR join.

CAPPY, Justice, dissenting.

The majority advocates that a strict no-fault policy be applied to broken engagements. In endorsing this view, the majority argues that it is not only the modern trend but also the approach which will eliminate the inherent weaknesses of a fault based analysis. According to the majority, by adopting a strict no fault approach, we will remove from the courtroom the necessity of delving into the inter-personal dynamics of broken engagements in order to decide which party retains possession of the engagement ring. This view brings to mind the words of Thomas Campbell from The Jilted Nymph: "Better be courted and jilted than never be courted at all." As I cannot endorse this approach, I respectfully dissent.

An engagement ring is a traditional token of the pledge to marry. It is a symbol of nuptial intent dating back to AD 860. The engagement ring was to be of a valued metal representing a financial sacrifice for the husband to be. Two other customs regarding the engagement ring were established in that same century: forfeiture of the ring by a man who reneged on a marriage pledge; surrender of the ring by the woman who broke off an engagement. See Charles Panati, Extraordinary Origins of Everyday Things (copyright 1987). This concept is consistent with conditional gift law, which has always been followed in Pennsylvania. Stanger v. Epler, 382 Pa. 411, 115 A.2d 197 (1955); Ruehling v. Hornung, 98 Pa.Super. 535 (1930); C.J.S. Gifts § 61. *10 When the marriage does not take place the agreement is void and the party who prevented the marriage agreement from being fulfilled must forfeit the engagement ring. Pavlicic v. Vogtsberger, 390 Pa. 502, 136 A.2d 127 (1957).

The majority urges adoption of its position to relieve trial courts from having the onerous task of sifting through the debris of the broken engagement in order to ascertain who is truly at fault and if there lies a valid justification excusing fault. Could not this theory justifying the majority's decision be advanced in all other arenas that our trial courts must venture? Are broken engagements truly more disturbing than cases where we ask judges and juries to discern possible abuses in nursing homes, day care centers, dependency proceedings involving abused children, and criminal cases involving horrific, irrational injuries to innocent victims? The subject matter our able trial courts address on a daily basis is certainly of equal sordidness as any fact pattern they **648 may need to address in a simple case of who broke the engagement and why.

I can envision a scenario whereby the prospective bride and her family have expended thousands of dollars in preparation for the culminating event of matrimony and she is, through no fault of her own, left standing at the altar holding the caterer's bill. To add insult to injury, the majority would also strip her of her engagement ring. Why the majority feels compelled to modernize this relatively simple and ancient legal concept is beyond the understanding of this poor man.

Accordingly, as I see no valid reason to forgo the established precedent in Pennsylvania for determining possession of the engagement ring under the simple concept of conditional gift law, I cannot endorse the modern trend advocated by the majority. Respectfully, I dissent.

Justices CASTILLE and SAYLOR join this dissenting opinion.

*11 CASTILLE, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent from the majority's opinion because I do not believe that a no-fault policy should be applied to broken engagements and the issue of which party retains the engagement ring. The Restatement of Restitution, § 58 comment c, discusses the return of engagement rings and states that:

Gifts made in the hope that a marriage or contract of marriage will result are not recoverable, in the absence of fraud. Gifts made in anticipation of marriage are not ordinarily expressed to be conditional and, although there is an engagement to marry, if the marriage fails to occur without the fault of the donee, normally the gift cannot be recovered. If, however, the donee obtained the gift fraudulently or if the gift was made for a purpose which could be obtained only by the marriage, a donor who is not himself at fault is entitled to restitution if the marriage does not take place, even if the gift was money. If there is an

Fact of this case?
Well... I'm waiting!!! Politely!

Have a polite day!
Reply:What case?
Reply:Yes....??? I ask in a questioning tone.
Reply:We have listen to so much propagada that ego refuses to let us be civil.

Microsoft IIS File Contention?

Hi All,

I am breaking my head for two days with a simple problem.

I have created a web method using .Net web services and I am creating a text file inside the web method. when I call the webmethod for the first time, the text file is getting created without any issues, but when I call the webmethod again,I am getting "file in use exception", while monitoring the file I found out that the file is being used by aspnet_wp.exe process.

The IIS process is holding the text file untill it is restarted, Please find the code snipet below :

[WebMethod]

public string HelloWorld()

{

try

{

File.Create(@"C:\Testing\ControlEnd.tx...

return "File created successfuly";

}

catch(Exception ex)

{

return "Error in file creation"+ex.ToString();

}

}

Could someone help me in getting this resolved?

Microsoft IIS File Contention?
I believe that File.Create returns a FileStream object, that must be closed after you are done with the file. Because you are not closing the file, the file remains open and locked.

Science help 1-10?

A) Goal

(B) Model

(C) Data

(D) Evaluation

(E) Revision

1: A car mechanic is given a 1966 Mustang to fix. The owner's complaint is that the engine runs roughly, especially when the car is accelerating. The mechanic's first guess as to the source of the problem is that the fuel mix is too rich. After adjusting the fuel mix valve, the problem persists, so the mechanic then guesses that the sparkplug advance mechanism is faulty. Replacing the sparkplug advance mechanism (the diaphragm attached to the distributor) fixes the problem, and the fixed car is returned to the owner.

A, B, C

A, C, D, E

A, B, C, D

A, B, C, D, E

2: To determine the most effective sales strategy, consumer goods retailers sometimes do experiments. These experiments help the retailer understand how people decide what to purchase. For example, the retailer can change whether a product is displayed on a high or low shelf, or can change which products are displayed nearby. The retailer then analyzes these data, and changes their product displays so as to maximize sales.

A, B, C, D, E

A, C, D

A, B, D, E

A, B, C, D

3: A wildlife biologist is put in charge of designing a strategy to maintain a population of mountain lions in West Texas. The first action taken by this biologist is to determine whether population size is increasing or decreasing, while allowing current management practices to continue. By tagging animals and monitoring the population over 10 years, the biologist discovers that the population is declining at 3% per year.

A, B, C,

A, C, D, E

A, B, C, D

A, B, C, D, E

4: Mixtures are generally separated by what methods?

Chemical

Physical

Mechanical

Optical

5: All solutions are mixtures, but not all mixtures are solutions.

Always true

Always false

True, with the exception of water

False, with the exception of water

6: As the temperature of a mixture increases, one part of the mixture may melt while the other parts remain solid.

Always true

Always false

True for all liquid mixtures

False for all liquid mixtures

7: Which of these is not a mixture?

Oil and water

Sand and water

Diet Soda

All are mixtures

8: Before the creation of the world as we know it, the earth:

Was flat

Was bright

Was empty

Was inhabited by fish men

9: How many days did it take for God to complete creating the world?

5

3

7

8

10: On the first day, God saw that the light was:

Bright

Too dim

Hot

Good

Science help 1-10?
Here's my attempt at some of the questions:

1. A, C, D, E

2. A, B, C, D, E

3. A, B, C, D

4.

5.

6.

7. Diet Soda

8. was empty

9. technically 6, as on the 7th day he rested

10. good

Please help me with these questions for 10 point each!?

Which of the following five terms below best matches the situations given in questions 1-3:

(A) Goal

(B) Model

(C) Data

(D) Evaluation

(E) Revision

Flower Parts

for questions 26 - 30.

1: A car mechanic is given a 1966 Mustang to fix. The owner's complaint is that the engine runs roughly, especially when the car is accelerating. The mechanic's first guess as to the source of the problem is that the fuel mix is too rich. After adjusting the fuel mix valve, the problem persists, so the mechanic then guesses that the sparkplug advance mechanism is faulty. Replacing the sparkplug advance mechanism (the diaphragm attached to the distributor) fixes the problem, and the fixed car is returned to the owner.

A, B, C

A, C, D, E

A, B, C, D

A, B, C, D, E

2: To determine the most effective sales strategy, consumer goods retailers sometimes do experiments. These experiments help the retailer understand how people decide what to purchase. For example, the retailer can change whether a product is displayed on a high or low shelf, or can change which products are displayed nearby. The retailer then analyzes these data, and changes their product displays so as to maximize sales.

A, B, C, D, E

A, C, D

A, B, D, E

A, B, C, D

3: A wildlife biologist is put in charge of designing a strategy to maintain a population of mountain lions in West Texas. The first action taken by this biologist is to determine whether population size is increasing or decreasing, while allowing current management practices to continue. By tagging animals and monitoring the population over 10 years, the biologist discovers that the population is declining at 3% per year.

A, B, C,

A, C, D, E

A, B, C, D

A, B, C, D, E

4: Mixtures are generally separated by what methods?

Chemical

Physical

Mechanical

Optical

5: All solutions are mixtures, but not all mixtures are solutions.

Always true

Always false

True, with the exception of water

False, with the exception of water

6: As the temperature of a mixture increases, one part of the mixture may melt while the other parts remain solid.

Always true

Always false

True for all liquid mixtures

False for all liquid mixtures

7: Which of these is not a mixture?

Oil and water

Sand and water

Diet Soda

All are mixtures

8: Before the creation of the world as we know it, the earth:

Was flat

Was bright

Was empty

Was inhabited by fish men

9: How many days did it take for God to complete creating the world?

5

3

7

8

10: On the first day, God saw that the light was:

Bright

Too dim

Hot

Good

11: In order to give light to the world, on the fourth day God created how many great lights?

1

2

3

4

12: Latin was the language of the Romans. "Gravity" comes from the Latin word "gravis". What does it mean?

Light

Heavy

Medium

Great

13: An astronaut will feel less gravitational pull on the Moon than on Earth. Therefore,

an astronaut can jump much further on the Moon

an astronaut will feel very heavy on the Moon and be unable to jump

an astronaut will jump the same distance on the Moon as on Earth

an astronaut cannot jump anywhere because the suit is too heavy

14: One of the following statements is wrong , which one?

The bigger an object, the bigger gravity force it exerts

The force of gravity is also present on the Moon

When you jump into the air, you automatically start flying

Everything is attracted to the Earth due to the force of gravity

15: The greenhouse effect is when the atmosphere warms because of

Nitrogen

Carbon dioxide

Fluorine

Oxygen

16: What is the highest of the following levels of the atmosphere?

Mesosphere

Stratosphere

Thermosphere

Troposphere

17: Denudation is

breathing in and out

a process of erosion

when volcanoes break the surface

tearing the petals off of a flower

18: Which of these mammals is the largest animal in the world?

Blue whale

Kangaroo

Elephant

None of the above

19: Which of the following do all mammals have?

Scales

Hair

Feathers

Legs

20: Bats are the only mammals that can. . .

Hang upside down

Live in haunted houses

Fly

Eat insects

21: Certain types of cancer are genetic.

True

False

22: Ethnicity is a factor in the development of skin cancer.

True

False

23: HPV, a virus that has been linked to cancer, is contagious.

True

False

24: Men cannot develop breast cancer.

True

False

25: Cancer is a group of over 500 diseases.

True

False

26: Which part holds the plant upright and transports food and water?

The roots

The stem

The filament

The sepal

27: What is the name used when the pollen and the ovule join together to make a seed?

Reproduction

Planting

Birth

Cloning

28: Which part of the plant has the male and female reproductive organs?

Flowers

Stems

Anthers

Nodes

29: The anther is which of the following?

The female part of the plant

The male part of the plant

An asexual part of the plant

Not a part of a plant

30: Pollen is produced in which of these parts of a flower?

The stem

The style

The sepal

The anther

Please help me with these questions for 10 point each!?
Normally, I'd help you. But you're asking us to do your entire homework page!
Reply:here are some of the answers. and don't dare complain that i should give more.

4. physical

9. it's actually six because God rested on the seventh day

13. ...can jump much further...

14. when you jump into the air...

15. carbon dioxide

17. a process of erosion

19. hair

20. fly

21. true

25. false

26. roots

27. reproduction

28. flowers
Reply:lol yeah wht she said haah dont be lazy:) haah i would help..but its too much to read* lazy me too ahha*

or nah.. hmm sorry cant help:(
Reply:you really should spend LESS time on the `net and MORE time "studying".

after-all , that`s what Education is all about...!

sorry , no answers from me!

salary survey

Mac G4 kernel trap CPU 0 Kernel Panic?

Unresolved kernel trap(cpu 0): 0x300 - Data access DAR=0x0000000000000000 PC=0x00000000002D1248

Latest crash info for cpu 0:

Exception state (sv=0x3C4EB500)

PC=0x002D1248; MSR=0x00009030; DAR=0x00000000; DSISR=0x40000000; LR=0x002D2250; R1=0x176D3CE0; XCP=0x0000000C (0x300 - Data access)

Backtrace:

0x002D2244 0x002EC058 0x0008C69C 0x00029234 0x000233F8 0x000ABEAC

0xFFCACACA

Proceeding back via exception chain:

Exception state (sv=0x3C4EB500)

previously dumped as "Latest" state. skipping...

Exception state (sv=0x2C919A00)

PC=0x9000B348; MSR=0x0000F030; DAR=0x0036D0E4; DSISR=0x0A000000; LR=0x9000B29C; R1=0xF0100C40; XCP=0x00000030 (0xC00 - System call)

Kernel version:

Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC

panic(cpu 0 caller 0xFFFF0003): 0x300 - Data access

Latest stack backtrace for cpu 0:

Backtrace:

0x000954F8 0x00095A10 0x00026898 0x000A8204 0x000ABB80

Proceeding back via exception chain:

Exception state (sv=0x3C4EB500)

PC=0x002D1248; MSR=0x00009030; DAR=0x00000000; DSISR=0x40000000; LR=0x002D2250; R1=0x176D3CE0; XCP=0x0000000C (0x300 - Data access)

Backtrace:

0x002D2244 0x002EC058 0x0008C69C 0x00029234 0x000233F8 0x000ABEAC

0xFFCACACA

Exception state (sv=0x2C919A00)

PC=0x9000B348; MSR=0x0000F030; DAR=0x0036D0E4; DSISR=0x0A000000; LR=0x9000B29C; R1=0xF0100C40; XCP=0x00000030 (0xC00 - System call)

Kernel version:

Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPCModel: PowerMac3,3, BootROM 4.2.8f1, 2 processors, PowerPC G4 (2.9), 500 MHz, 1 GB

Graphics: ATI Radeon 9000 Pro, ATY,RV250, AGP, 64 MB

Memory Module: DIMM0/J21, 256 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333

Memory Module: DIMM1/J22, 256 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333

Memory Module: DIMM2/J23, 256 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333

Memory Module: DIMM3/J24, 256 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333

AirPort: AirPort, 9.52

Modem: Spring, UCJ, V.90, 6.0F, APPLE VERSION 0007, 7/31/2000

Network Service: Built-in Ethernet, Ethernet, en0

PCI Card: pci1106,3038, sppci_usbuniversal, SLOT-B

PCI Card: pci1106,3038, sppci_usbuniversal, SLOT-B

PCI Card: pci1106,3104, SLOT-B

PCI Card: firewire, ieee1394, SLOT-B

PCI Card: usb, usb, SLOT-C

PCI Card: usb, usb, SLOT-C

PCI Card: pci9005,1f, SLOT-C

Parallel ATA Device: Maxtor 4R120L0, 114.5 GB

Parallel ATA Device: WDC WD400JB-00ENA0, 37.27 GB

Parallel ATA Device: SAMSUNG SP0411N, 37.31 GB

Parallel ATA Device: TSSTcorpCD/DVDW SH-S162L

USB Device: Hub, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 500 mA

USB Device: USB RECEIVER, Logitech, Up to 1.5 Mb/sec, 100 mA

USB Device: M2452, Alps Electric, Up to 1.5 Mb/sec, 100 mA

USB Device: MP140 series, Canon, Up to 480 Mb/sec, 500 mA

USB Device: Hub, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 500 mA

USB Device: Studio Display, Up to 1.5 Mb/sec, 500 mA

FireWire Device: unknown_device, unknown_value, Up to 400 Mb/sec

Mac G4 kernel trap CPU 0 Kernel Panic?
Looks like a normal Kernal Panic. How long has it been since you ran Repair Permissions? Sometimes that helps. I have one G4 that has been having Kernal Panics since it was new (2001) and it's still going strong.

Run Repair Permissions about once a month and every time you do a system update. You find this under Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility/Repair Permissions. I keep an alias of the app on my dock so I don't have to look it up when I run it.

If they kernal panics are too frequent see if you have added anything new recently, like RAM, PCI cards, etc. If you haven't and they bother you call Apple for advice.

Warcraft 3 Error?

This application has encountered a critical error:

FATAL ERROR!

Program: c:\program files\warcraft iii\war3.exe

Exception: 0xC0000005 (ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:6F042A39

The instruction at '0x6F042A39' referenced memory at '0x00000034'.

The memory could not be 'read'.

Press OK to terminate the application.

OK

Warcraft 3 Error?
try rebooting if u havent ... does ur pc have the system requirements for the game is the next question ..
Reply:Press OK.
Reply:There are a few things that would probably fix that. Try running a registry cleaner. I suggest Eusing's Free Registry Cleaner. If that doesn't fix it, you can also try to defrag. That may also help.
Reply:Try to install The world of War Craft first. I think you have installed the expasion version only.
Reply:this is memory related problem . try to increase/replace your ram
Reply:Solution: Download and install .Net framework 2 from microsoft site.
Reply:I get this error every so often as well. Depending when you get it etc it may be alot of things. What has happened is that warcraft has lost the rights to a location of memory and this is not good. Windows doesn't like programs accessing memory it's not supposed to. If it happens everytime you do something in a custom map. It's the map makers fault. If it happens randomly it's blizzards fault. Not alot you can do besides general cleaning of your computer

Yes it's called a memory leak. Happens with the best of programs. basically you have pointers that point to areas of ram so if the pointer is deleted and the data is not released you have a memory leak because that memory is still owned but unusable. The chances of it failing increase with length of a game
Reply:Lol at the guy who said reinstalling World of warcraft. WC3 and Wow are 2 different things. To answer your question, that is probably an error THAT will affect everyone in the game(all of them will DC). I have experienced it many times with my friends becuz we played too long and caused "memory leak" where by ram is being used up because we played too many games. Usually problem occurs when any ONE of the players' computer has too little ram left to be used, etc. Solution: To reboot or ban that player if you know who it was(pp those who keep lagging)^^
Reply:Go here:http://www.unitedforums.co.uk/vb/general...

Friday, July 31, 2009

Chemistry help?

Chemistry help?

I need help with nero vision 3?? suddenly not working wont do any burn phrase? it can buff and process files..

Help please?

Fact of this case?

Microsoft IIS File Contention?

Science help 1-10?

Please help me with these questions for 10 point each!?

Mac G4 kernel trap CPU 0 Kernel Panic?

Warcraft 3 Error?

c++ exception

Blog Archive

About Me